ING Direct Lags the Competition is brought to you by Canadian Capitalist -- Helping you to invest & prosper.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ccapitalist/~3/X0kWfiE_AWQ/
ING Direct Lags the Competition is brought to you by Canadian Capitalist -- Helping you to invest & prosper.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ccapitalist/~3/X0kWfiE_AWQ/
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/5fG1cRKRzj4/profile2.html
Filed under: Economy, Investing, Investing Basics
With the U.S. and European debt crises, concern about a double-dip recession and some lingering numbness from the market woes of a few short years ago, these are uncertain times. And investors are looking for investment strategies that will lead to wealth amid all the uncertainty.Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/08/04/larry-lights-tips-on-taming-the-wall-street-beast/
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/0R2wEiSLwoc/profile.html
Source: http://twitter.com/jpmorgan/statuses/240666317856833536
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/-Mbdt1SCvTM/profile.html
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/vODKSRdlp0M/profile2.html
Filed under: Investing, ETFs, Investing Basics
The investment world's love affair with all things ETF did not wane in 2010, as their share of the market rose to $940 billion in assets, held in more than 1,000 exchange-traded funds.Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/12/04/etfs-2010-winners-losers-best-worst-warnings/
This post has been updated.
All 125 commercial vessels working to clean up the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico have been ordered back to shore temporarily after four workers on three separate vessels became ill, according to a Deepwater Horizon Response press release.
It's unclear whether the crew members were working with chemical oil dispersants, which have been criticized for their toxicity. Our calls to officials in the region have not yet been returned.
The sick workers said they had headaches and chest pain, and were nauseated and dizzy. One was taken by helicopter to a hospital in Marrero, La., another was taken by boat and two were taken in an ambulance, according to the press release.
The current symptoms mirror those of other fishermen who were hired by BP to help clean up the spill, as we pointed out earlier this week. The dispersants BP is using to break up the oil have many health risks of their own. Earlier this month, the EPA told BP to stop using the chemicals and to switch to something else, but BP says there is no better alternative.
Update, 5/27:
According to Captain Meredith Austin, the Coast Guard deputy incident commander, controlled burns were being executed and aerial dispersants were being used in the vicinity of the affected workers, but no dispersants were being sprayed within 50 miles of the workers.
"It's important to keep in mind there are other factors which may potentially cause these symptoms," Austin told reporters on a conference call this evening. She named the smell of petroleum, heat and fatigue as possible causes for the symptoms.
Workers were not given respiratory protection equipment because according to Austin, prior air sampling performed in the area concluded that the level of chemical exposure was permissible.
Source: http://feeds.propublica.org/~r/propublica/energy-environment/~3/yldMx39xN7E/
Author(s):
The growing mobile landscape is producing a “multi-platform” news consumer no longer content to “read all about it.”
Half of U.S. adults—a dramatic increase over last year--are now connected to the Internet through a tablet computer or smartphone, according to a comprehensive new study conducted by Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism in collaboration with The Economist Group. And news is an important part of what these users do on their mobile devices. Almost two-thirds of tablet (64 percent) and smartphone (62 percent) owners say they use the devices for news at least weekly.
This brave new world of news consumption has been hastened by the rapid acceptance of tablet computers, the Pew report finds. Twenty-two percent—double the number from last year—are tablet owners, while another 3 percent of adults regularly use a tablet owned by someone else in their home (another 23 percent, who do not own a tablet, plan to jump on the bandwagon in the next six months).
Almost half (44 percent) of U.S. adults own a smartphone, up from 35 percent in May 2011, the survey found.
This new generation of mobile news consumers is delving beyond checking the headlines on their devices, although nearly all use them to check for news updates, Pew reports. Nearly three-quarters (73 percent) of respondents said they read in-depth articles at least sometimes, including 19 percent who report doing so daily, Sixty-one percent of smartphone news consumers read longer stories sometimes, while 11 percent do so regularly.
The survey of 9,513 U.S. adults finds that most tablet and smartphone users are content with accessing the news on their browsers (60 percent) instead of news apps (23 percent). There is also resistance to paying for content on mobile devices. Only 24 percent of respondents are considering dropping their print subscriptions for a digital one. These users tend to be younger, who are traditionally more tech-savvy).
How does the “multi-platform” user get their news? Fifty-four percent of tablet news users also get news on a smartphone, while 77 percent get news on a desktop or laptop computer, half get their news in print, and one-quarter get news on all four platforms. Among smartphone users, 47 percent also still get news in print while 75 percent get news on their laptop/desktop and 28 percent get the news on a tablet.
Related Content:
American Voters Think Locally for Their News: Survey
Source: http://www.millionairecorner.com/article/news-going-mobile
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/SIMWnLu_l4s/profile.html
Canadians who head down south for a good part of the winter to enjoy sunnier skies and a milder climate – and the opportunity to golf in January – are known as snowbirds. Although there are other options, the Sunbelt of the U.S. is by far the most popular destination – it’s close by, has [...]
The post Snowbirds: What You Need To Know appeared first on Boomer & Echo.
Source: http://www.boomerandecho.com/snowbirds-what-you-need-to-know/
Unless you've been living in the middle of nowhere, you're probably aware that the United States' federal deficit is quite large, to say the least. The number is so big, in fact, that it's hard to wrap your head around. Once you begin talking about trillions, it almost sounds as if it's made up.
Unfortunately, the situation is quite real. What is also real is the attempt by lawmakers to shrink this number, and the proposals made to go about it. Some of these proposals could affect your retirement. More specifically, a few of them are targeting Social Security payments, both for people who are already retired and those who are approaching retirement. Below, we will look at the proposals that have been made.
The Ironic Cuts
Despite the fact that Social Security payments are low for a great number of people, many retirees rely on the money they receive in order to make ends meet. If their benefits were lowered, they could be financially ruined. The irony here is that a big reason why cuts are being proposed is to to make up for the damage done to the deficit during the housing market crash. But what some people don't even consider is the fact that this housing market crash harmed the same retirees that would be affected by such cuts. For them, it's a double whammy.
Proposal #1: Raise The Retirement Age to 70.
Currently, the normal retirement age stands at 66. Beginning in 2017 and ending in 2022, there will be a two month increase to this age each year. At that time, the normal retirement age will be 67. This new proposal, however, would alter this quite a bit. If successful, the increase would begin in 2013 and end in 2036, at which point the normal retirement age would reach 70.
Impact: The current rules for collecting Social Security state that each month that a person retires early, he or she will receive a cut in benefits. Since you are permitted to retire as soon as you reach 62, this new normal retirement age would increase the number of months that you could retire early, thus increasing your reduction.
Proposal #2: Base The Social Security Formula on progressive price indexation (PPI).
By basing the Social Security formula on progressive price indexation, those who have annual earnings less than $22,300 would see a rise in benefits. This increase would be equal to inflation for those who earn the maximum amount of $106,800.
Impact: The problem with this proposal is that it damages too many people. While its design would help to lower the federal deficit and benefit the lower half of earners, middle-income workers would be negatively affected. And since there are a great number of middle-income workers, this impact could be huge.
Proposal #3: 1% reduction in the cost of living adjustment (COLA).
This proposal isn't anything new. It has been introduced in the past. The reason it has never lost popularity is because many people claim that the consumer price index (CPI) used in this calculation does not accurately provide the needed cost of living adjustment.
Impact: This proposal stands out from the rest because of the group that would be affected. Rather than impacting those who were approaching retirement like the other two proposals, this would affect those who are already retired. Another consideration is the fact that the older a retiree is, the greater he or she would be affected.
Source: http://firstsecurityfinancialshow.com/blog/bid/179278/The-Impact-of-Social-Security-Cuts
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/1LkSGffvWyA/profile.html
Filed under: Energy
The U.S. solar PV market rose sharply in the second quarter of 2012, compared both to the previous quarter and year-over-year. Total solar PV installations in the U.S. during the second quarter amounted to 741.7 megawatts, up from 512 megawatts in the first quarter and 343.2 megawatts in the same period a year ago.
The data comes from GTM Research's "U.S. Solar Market Insight Report" for the second quarter of 2012. The U.S. and China are the two remaining large growth markets for solar PV as both Germany and Italy have stalled. In the U.S., utility installations have more than doubled while commercial installations have fallen and residential installations have stalled.
The report notes a few trends:
GTM Research thinks 3,200 megawatts of solar PV will be installed in 2012, down 100 megawatts from the firm's earlier estimate. That number represents a 71% increase over total 2011 installations.
The installed system price fell by 22% quarter over quarter, from $4.44 per watt to $3.45 per watt. The year-over-year-decline came to 33%.
Most important for solar PV module manufacturers is component pricing. And here's where things get tough for U.S. makers like First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR), Sunpower Corp. (NASDAQ: SPWR) and Chinese firms Trina Solar Ltd. (NYSE: TSL), Suntech Power Holdings Co. Ltd. (NYSE: STP), LDK Solar Co. Ltd. (NYSE: LDK), JA Solar Holding Co. Ltd. (NASDAQ: JASO), and Canadian Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: CSIQ).
Blended average module pricing fell from $1.56 per watt in the second quarter of 2011 to just $0.87 per watt this year, a decline of 58%. Chinese makers have not shown any significant impact from the anti-dumping tariffs imposed by the U.S. government earlier this year. GTM Research estimates that the tariffs add just $0.08 per watt to the cost of Chinese solar modules shipped through Taiwan under different tolling arrangements.
For 2013, the research firm expects market growth for solar PV to slide from 71% this year to 21%. The firm also thinks expansion in the years through 2016 will be about 25% to 30% - not bad, but far lower than the growth rates of the past few years.
An executive summary of the GTM Research report is available here.
Paul Ausick
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/press/ultra-short-pulse-laser-high-efficiency-cell-concepts/
Filed under: Economy, Investing, Investing Basics
With the U.S. and European debt crises, concern about a double-dip recession and some lingering numbness from the market woes of a few short years ago, these are uncertain times. And investors are looking for investment strategies that will lead to wealth amid all the uncertainty.Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/08/04/larry-lights-tips-on-taming-the-wall-street-beast/
Source: http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/press/inflatable-solar-panels/
Source: http://twitter.com/jpmorgan/statuses/247674362063355904
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/fPs1InhV7L8/profile2.html
Filed under: Company News, Technology, Telecom
Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO) is not getting a new Chief Executive Officer yet, but the timeline may finally be closer. CEO John Chambers told Bloomberg in an interview today that he and the company have identified some of the senior leaders at the company who could succeed him. His timeline was put in the two-year to four-year range. This is important because the 63-year old Chambers has been considered a possible retirement candidate in the not so distant future for a year or more now.
Chambers has been CEO since 1995 and there are as many as ten different potential candidates according to the interview. Three who were mentioned (beyond an immediate ';if-needed' replacement of COO Gary Moore) are Robert Lloyd, Chuck Robbins, and Edzard Overbeek. What is interesting is that Chambers indicated that if the board of directors and shareholders want him to that he would likely hold on to the Chairman title even after he retires from the role of Chief Executive Officer.
We would take this one of two ways. Either Chambers is starting his bowing-out process by finally talking about it, or he is simply going to retire in two to four years. He has already overhauled the operations a year ago and Chambers talked up giving his officers more and more responsibility.
Today's news shows is having little direct impact. Shares are down 0.3% at $18.74 against a 52-week range of $14.93 to $21.30.
JON C. OGG
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/ATYxG50pHlE/profile2.html
Source: http://www.modestmoney.com/september-22nd-2012-favorite-blog-posts/
Source: http://ciovaccocapital.com/wordpress/index.php/currencies/internal-problems-in-spain-escalate/
Earlier this year, Bank of America conducted a study entitled the Merrill Lynch Affluent Insights Survey. This study, which began in 2009, focuses on a variety of subjects each year, with an overall goal to provide a bit of insight into the financial and retirement needs of the American public. For 2012's survey, they asked questions regarding the current state of retirement and Social Security.
Mark 2022 on Your Calendars
One focus of the survey conducted by Bank of America was regarding Social Security. As you may have heard, the Social Security is currently being threatened. This is because the gap separating the amounts being collected and the amounts being paid out is widening. At some point, the collected amounts will overcome the checks being sent out. According to estimates, this will happen in the year 2022. Once that happens, it is possible that the amounts that people receive (which are already very low) will decrease. This is why many people believe that changes must be made to the system.
An Older Workforce
Statistics from 1993 show that 29% of the United States' workforce was older than 55, according to the Labor Department. Last year, their newest survey showed that the number had risen to 40%. These results demonstrate that an increasing number are not retiring simply because they reach a certain birthday. Yes, this is how things worked in the past, but the American sentiment has changed. Now people are retiring not because of their age, but simply because they are ready and/or feel that it is the right time.
Survey Backs Up Older Workforce
Bank of America's survey backed up the above sentiment. The results show that, of the individuals surveyed who were under 62 years of age and had not yet retired, 62% were not planning to retire early. Instead, a number of them planned to put off their retirement for as long as possible, both for financial and personal reasons. In addition to this, the survey also showed that not quite 15% of those over 50 stated that age would be a main reason concerning their decision of when to retire. These results show that, for one reason or another, the average American worker is more than willing to keep working, and that number is likely to continue increasing.
Affluent People Say "Raise the Retirement Age"
The study from Bank of America shows that affluent individuals believe that the retirement age should be raised in order to affect change to the current Social Security outlook. In fact, of those with at least $250,000 in assets, 59% felt this way. If the retirement age was increased to match our increased life expectancy, it could fix the problem of the widening gap between the amount being collected and the amount being paid to retirees, at least for quite a number of years. The only thing missing from the survey was a specific age that respondents would consider having the retirement age raised to, though adding on at least a few years would probably be acceptable.
Different Study Shows Concern For the Deficit
Toward the end of last year, Wells Fargo had its own survey completed. The results showed that 47% of respondents with assets totaling at least $100,000 believe that a cut in benefits, whether from Social Security or Medicare, would help lower the U.S. debt. However, the study also indicated that only 23% of a person's retirement funds would come from Social Security. This indicates that other sources of continuing income during retirement are necessary, despite concerns of the deficit.
Source: http://firstsecurityfinancialshow.com/blog/bid/154640/Affluent-Say-Raise-Social-Security-Age